Every successful conference needs an active organising committee. But who’s responsible for doing what?
Every successful conference needs an active organising committee. But who’s responsible for doing what?
Peer review is critical to maintaining research quality at conferences. But what are the implications of using single blind vs double blind review?
When you’re choosing a conference venue, a checklist can help you wade through the options out there. These questions will help you make sure you don’t miss a thing.
To contextualise the changes we’ve seen in the scholarly events industry over the past few years, we take a deep dive into how societies and associations are connecting and engaging with their communities, specifically through the lens of their research and technical conferences.
Over the course of 15 months (early-2022 to mid-2023), we conducted 27 open-ended interviews with a cross-section of our Ex Ordo customers, scholarly societies, and industry representatives. We asked each about their goals, activities, issues, and challenges. We listened, we learned. We identified several themes and trends. And we compiled a list of the top 10 insights, which we’re happy to share with you below.
Peer review dates back to 1731 and, unsurprisingly, it’s evolved a lot since then. Here’s how to make sure your review system is up to the job.
As podcasting has evolved, there’s a growing legion of academic podcasts delivering millions of hours of free knowledge. Here are 10 of the best.
How high is too high when pricing your conference registration fees, and how low means you won’t break even?
