Diversity in peer review
7 September 2018
Why this year’s Peer Review Week (10 – 15 September) is focusing on diversity and inclusion.
Posts about: Peer reviewing
Single vs double-blind peer review?
28 August 2018
This computer science conference tested single vs double-blind review. Here’s what they found.
Simplify the review process with Ex Ordo
12 April 2017
With research conferences, the review process is crucial to developing a strong technical program. Submissions to conferences should be reviewed by experts in each particular topic area. Reviewers score and grade submissions and make a recommendation for acceptance or rejection to the chair. Ex Ordo’s platform minimises the pain involved in reviewing. Our aim is to…
Peer review: difference between single and double blind
25 October 2016
Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s research to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, prior to presenting their work at a conference and/or publication in a journal. The main role of the peer review process is to reinforce the credibility of research by facilitating its’ evaluation and to improve…
Improve your review process with peer review software
14 September 2016
When organising a research conference, the biggest headache often lies with the peer review stage. Peer review software that assists with the abstract management process wasn’t always as advanced as nowadays. Conference organisers and their admin team were required to manually collect submissions, check each submission complied with the formatting, reject if they did…
Must-have peer review system features
30 June 2016
If you’ve organised a research conference in the past, you will be aware of the mammoth amount of work involved in the abstract management process. Indeed, while of course the entire process is an enormous task, it’s the peer review phase that takes up the greatest effort. So you’re seeking a peer review system, but…